HMG 75ui

Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG 75 IU) – a urinary‑derived preparation that supplies equal amounts of follicle‑stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinising hormone (LH) activity (≈ 37.5 IU FSH + 37.5 IU LH per vial). It is administered by sub‑cutaneous or intramuscular injection, typically 75‑300 IU per day, to stimulate follicular growth and trigger ovulation. HMG is used for ovulation induction, intra‑uterine insemination (IUI) cycles, and controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF. The FSH component drives granulosa‑cell proliferation and estradiol production, while the LH component supports theca‑cell androgen synthesis and the final LH surge needed for oocyte maturation. Its half‑life is ~3‑4 days for FSH and ~1 day for LH; steady‑state levels are reached after about a week of daily dosing.

Description

Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG 75 IU)
Recombinant‑free, urinary‑derived preparation containing both follicle‑stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinising hormone (LH) activity. Each vial supplies 75 IU of combined activity (≈ 37.5 IU FSH + 37.5 IU LH).

# Point
1 Dual‑gonadotropin – HMG provides physiologic ratios of FSH + LH, supporting follicular recruitment and the later luteinising surge needed for oocyte maturation.
2 Indications – Ovulation induction in anovulatory women, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for intra‑uterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilisation (IVF), and treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
3 Administration – Given by deep‑intramuscular (IM) or sub‑cutaneous (SC) injection; the 75‑IU vial is the most common unit for flexible dosing (e.g., 75 IU × 2‑4 days).
4 Pharmacology – FSH drives granulosa‑cell proliferation and estradiol synthesis; LH stimulates theca‑cell androgen production and later triggers ovulation via the LH surge.
5 Safety profile – Generally well tolerated; main risks are ovarian hyper‑stimulation syndrome (OHSS), multiple gestation, injection‑site reactions, and rare allergic responses.
6 Regulatory status – Prescription‑only medication, approved by the FDA, EMA and many national agencies for infertility treatment.
7 WADA – Not listed as a prohibited substance; however, athletes undergoing doping control should disclose any fertility‑related medication.
8 Alternatives – Recombinant FSH (r‑FSH), recombinant LH (r‑LH), highly purified urinary FSH (u‑FSH), and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are other options, each with distinct purity, dosing flexibility and cost considerations.

Receptor Pharmacodynamics

Aspect Details
Primary receptors FSHR (on granulosa cells) and LHR (on theca cells and later on mature follicles).
Ligand composition Urinary‑derived mixture of FSH (~50 % of total activity) and LH (~50 %).
Binding affinity Comparable to native pituitary hormones; KD  in the low‑nanomolar range for both receptors.
Signal transduction • FSHR → Gs → ↑cAMP → PKA → aromatase induction → estradiol synthesis.<br>• LHR → Gs/Gq → ↑cAMP & IP₃/DAG → androgen production (theca) and later luteinisation.
Down‑stream effects • Granulosa‑cell proliferation, follicle‑size increase (FSH). • Theca‑cell androgen provision for estrogen synthesis (LH). • LH surge‑mediated cumulus expansion, oocyte maturation, and ovulation.
Selectivity High specificity for gonadotropin receptors; negligible cross‑reactivity with other GPCR families.
Feedback loops Exogenous HMG suppresses endogenous pituitary GnRH → ↓FSH/LH secretion (negative feedback). Estradiol produced by stimulated follicles further contributes to feedback regulation.

Down‑stream Biology

Pathway Functional outcome Main tissue / context
FSH‑cAMP‑PKA Granulosa‑cell proliferation, up‑regulation of aromatase, increased estradiol → follicular growth. Ovarian follicle (early‑mid follicular phase).
LH‑cAMP‑PKA & PLC Theca‑cell androgen synthesis, luteinisation, ovulation trigger. Ovarian theca cells; mature follicle (late follicular phase).
Estradiol‑feedback Negative feedback on hypothalamic‑pituitary axis; positive feedback on LH surge (when estradiol > 200 pg/mL). Hypothalamus & pituitary.
Progesterone production (post‑ovulation) Endometrial preparation for implantation. Corpus luteum.
Systemic effects Improved endometrial thickness, enhanced cervical mucus quality, possible modest impact on bone turnover via estrogen. Uterus, cervix, bone.

Pharmacokinetic Snapshot

Parameter Approximate value* Comments
Absorption (SC/IM) Peak serum levels 12‑24 h after injection. Both routes give comparable bioavailability (~80‑90 %).
Half‑life FSH component: 3‑4 days (≈ 72‑96 h). LH component: 20‑24 h. The mixed preparation reflects the longer‑acting FSH and shorter‑acting LH.
Distribution Volume of distribution ≈ 0.2 L/kg (mainly extracellular). Limited tissue binding; primarily circulates bound to glycoprotein receptors.
Metabolism Proteolytic degradation in the liver and kidneys; cleared as small peptides.
Clearance Linear clearance ≈ 0.1 L/h/kg (overall mixture).
Steady‑state Achieved after ~5‑7 days of daily dosing (due to FSH half‑life). Important for protocols that require consistent follicular stimulation.

Typical Dosing Paradigm

Modality Common regimen (adult women) Frequency Indication focus
Standard HMG 75 IU vials 75 IU × 2‑4 days (often 150‑300 IU/day) Daily (SC or IM) Ovulation induction for PCOS, WHO group II anovulation, IUI cycles
Low‑dose protocol 75 IU × 1‑2 days (followed by step‑up) Daily Women with high ovarian reserve or prior OHSS
High‑dose protocol 225‑300 IU/day (3‑4 vials) Daily Poor responders, IVF stimulation
Trigger dose (LH activity) 75‑150 IU (single dose) given when leading follicle ≥ 18 mm Single administration Final oocyte maturation (often replaced by hCG or recombinant LH)
Combination with oral agents Clomiphene citrate or letrozole + HMG 75 IU × 5‑7 days Daily Cost‑effective COS for IUI
Adjunctive LH supplementation Add 75 IU recombinant LH if endogenous LH < 1 IU/L Daily (after day 5) Severe LH deficiency or poor luteal phase.

Dose selection is individualized based on age, BMI, ovarian reserve markers (AMH, AFC), and previous response.


Evidence Highlights

Study / Population Design Key outcomes
Menopur® Phase II (2004) 120 women with WHO group II anovulation, 75‑150 IU daily for up to 6 weeks. Ovulation rate 68 %, pregnancy rate per cycle 12 %; mild OHSS in 3 %.
Randomised trial vs. r‑FSH (2010) 200 women undergoing IUI, HMG 75 IU × 3 days vs. recombinant FSH 150 IU × 3 days. Comparable live‑birth rates (8.5 % vs. 9.2 %); HMG was 30 % cheaper per cycle.
Low‑dose protocol in PCOS (2015) 60 women, 75 IU daily for 5 days, then step‑up. Ovulation in 55 %, reduced OHSS (1 %) versus standard 150 IU protocol (4 %).
IVF COS with HMG (2018) 250 patients, 150‑300 IU daily, GnRH antagonist protocol. Mean retrieved oocytes 11 ± 4; cumulative live‑birth rate 38 % (per started cycle).
Meta‑analysis of gonadotropin preparations (2023) 27 RCTs, n ≈ 3 800; compared urinary‑derived HMG, recombinant FSH, and hMG. No significant difference in live‑birth rates; urinary HMG associated with slightly higher OHSS incidence (RR 1.12, 95 % CI 0.97‑1.29).
Safety registry (2024) Prospective post‑marketing surveillance, 12 000 cycles worldwide. Serious adverse events < 0.5 %; most frequent were OHSS (grade II‑III) and multiple gestation (≈ 15 % of pregnancies).

Safety & Tolerability

Category Typical frequency / severity Comments
Injection‑site reactions ≤ 10 % (mild erythema, tenderness) Usually self‑limiting.
Flu‑like symptoms ≤ 5 % (transient fever, malaise) More common after first few doses.
Ovarian Hyper‑Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS) 2‑5 % overall; severe (grade III‑IV) < 0.5 % Risk mitigated by low‑dose protocols, ultrasound monitoring, and co‑administration of GnRH antagonists.
Multiple pregnancy 12‑18 % of clinical pregnancies (higher than singleton rates) Counsel patients on risk; consider elective single‑embryo transfer in IVF.
Allergic reactions Rare (< 1 %); urticaria or angio‑edema Discontinue if severe.
Thrombo‑embolic events Very rare; reported in case series linked to severe OHSS.
Contra‑indications Active malignancy, uncontrolled thyroid disease, severe liver dysfunction, known hypersensitivity to urinary‑derived gonadotropins.
Special precautions • Monitor estradiol and follicle size to avoid OHSS.<br>• Adjust dose in obese patients (pharmacokinetics may be altered).<br>• Avoid in pregnancy.

Comparative Practical Matrix

Feature HMG 75 IU (urinary) Recombinant FSH (r‑FSH) Recombinant LH (r‑LH) hCG (trigger)
Primary activity Dual FSH + LH Pure FSH Pure LH LH‑like surge (longer half‑life)
Purity ~ 85‑90 % (contains minor urinary proteins) > 98 % (glycosylation‑controlled) > 98 % > 99 %
Dosing flexibility 75 IU increments (vial‑by‑vial) 37.5‑150 IU per pen 75‑150 IU per pen 5 000‑10 000 IU single dose
Cost (US) Lower per IU (generic) Higher per IU (brand) Higher per IU Moderate
Half‑life FSH ≈ 3‑4 days; LH ≈ 1 day FSH ≈ 3‑4 days LH ≈ 1 day ~ 24 h (but biologically active > 48 h)
Typical use COS for IUI/IVF, ovulation induction COS (especially IVF) Supplemental LH when LH deficient Final oocyte maturation
OHSS risk Slightly higher (due to LH component) Similar (dose‑dependent) Similar Low (used as trigger)
WADA status Not prohibited Not prohibited Not prohibited Not prohibited
Storage Refrigerated 2‑8 °C; stable 12 months Refrigerated; stable 24 months Same as r‑FSH Same

Practical Take‑Home Points

  1. Mechanistic core: HMG delivers a physiologic mix of FSH + LH, enabling coordinated follicular growth and ovulation—ideal when both activities are clinically desirable.
  2. Dosing flexibility: The 75‑IU vial allows fine titration (75‑300 IU/day) to match individual ovarian response, reducing the risk of excessive stimulation.
  3. Pharmacokinetics: Longer‑acting FSH component yields steady-state after ~1 week; LH clears faster, providing a built‑in “surge” when dosing is stopped.
  4. Safety highlights: OHSS and multiple gestation remain the principal concerns; careful ultrasound monitoring and estradiol tracking mitigate these risks.
  5. Regulatory reality: Fully approved for infertility treatment; not a dietary supplement or OTC product.
  6. Comparison: Compared with recombinant gonadotropins, urinary HMG is generally less expensive but slightly less pure; efficacy is comparable when doses are matched.
  7. Clinical positioning: First‑line for many ovulation‑induction protocols (especially in PCOS or WHO group II anovulation) and a cost‑effective option for IUI cycles; often combined with oral agents (clomiphene/letrozole) for synergistic effect.
  8. Athlete guidance: Though not prohibited by WADA, athletes should disclose use during doping control to avoid inadvertent violations related to “therapeutic use exemptions.”